Genocide Watch reports Boers at risk of genocide in 2010


April 24 2010 – The International Campaign to End Genocide (Genocide Watch) lists South Africa’s Boers and Refugees  at risk of “Genocide, Politicide or Mass Atrocities at the hands of  Black Racists’.  (the red list under ‘Polarisation” -- according to the Genocide Watch list of Countries at Risk 2010. (copied below)

The genocide stage 5. POLARIZATION is: “ Extremists drive the groups apart. Hate groups broadcast polarizing propaganda. Laws may forbid intermarriage or social interaction. Extremist terrorism targets moderates, intimidating and silencing the center. Moderates from the perpetrators’ own group are most able to stop genocide, so are the first to be arrested and killed.

PREVENTION: Prevention may mean security protection for moderate leaders or assistance to human rights groups. Assets of extremists may be seized, and visas for international travel denied to them. Coups d’état by extremists should be opposed by international sanctions. “

The Eight Stages of Genocide: http://www.genocidewatch.org/aboutgenocide/8stagesofgenocide.html © 1998 Gregory H. Stanton. Originally presented as a briefing paper at the US State Department in 1996.


BoersAtRiskOfGenocideByBlackRacistsGenocideWatch2010_GlobalReportMap (2)

URL for page above: http://www.genocidewatch.org/aboutgenocide/countriesatrisk2010.html

URL for list below:


  Boers_Refugees_AtRiskOfGenocideByBlackRacistsGenocideWatch2010Report (2)

Scroll down to the document file for the above page: htttp://www.genocidewatch.org/images/CountriesatRisk2010GenocideWatchApril2010.doc

The 8 Stages of Genocide

By Gregory H. Stanton, President, Genocide Watch

  1. Classification
  2. Symbolization
  3. Dehumanization
  4. Organization
  5. Polarization
  6. Preparation
  7. Extermination
  8. Denial

Genocide is a process that develops in eight stages that are predictable but not inexorable. At each stage, preventive measures can stop it. The process is not linear.  Logically, later stages must be preceded by earlier stages.  But all stages continue to operate throughout the process.

1. CLASSIFICATION: All cultures have categories to distinguish people into “us and them” by ethnicity, race, religion, or nationality: German and Jew, Hutu and Tutsi. Bipolar societies that lack mixed categories, such as Rwanda and Burundi, are the most likely to have genocide. The main preventive measure at this early stage is to develop universalistic institutions that transcend ethnic or racial divisions, that actively promote tolerance and understanding, and that promote classifications that transcend the divisions. The Catholic church could have played this role in Rwanda, had it not been riven by the same ethnic cleavages as Rwandan society. Promotion of a common language in countries like Tanzania has also promoted transcendent national identity. This search for common ground is vital to early prevention of genocide.

2. SYMBOLIZATION: We give names or other symbols to the classifications. We name people “Jews” or “Gypsies”, or distinguish them by colors or dress; and apply the symbols to members of groups. Classification and symbolization are universally human and do not necessarily result in genocide unless they lead to the next stage, dehumanization. When combined with hatred, symbols may be forced upon unwilling members of pariah groups: the yellow star for Jews under Nazi rule, the blue scarf for people from the Eastern Zone in Khmer Rouge Cambodia. To combat symbolization, hate symbols can be legally forbidden (swastikas) as can hate speech. Group marking like gang clothing or tribal scarring can be outlawed, as well. The problem is that legal limitations will fail if unsupported by popular cultural enforcement. Though Hutu and Tutsi were forbidden words in Burundi until the 1980’s, code-words replaced them. If widely supported, however, denial of symbolization can be powerful, as it was in Bulgaria, where the government refused to supply enough yellow badges and at least eighty percent of Jews did not wear them, depriving the yellow star of its significance as a Nazi symbol for Jews.

3. DEHUMANIZATION: One group denies the humanity of the other group. Members of it are equated with animals, vermin, insects or diseases. Dehumanization overcomes the normal human revulsion against murder. At this stage, hate propaganda in print and on hate radios is used to vilify the victim group. In combating this dehumanization, incitement to genocide should not be confused with protected speech. Genocidal societies lack constitutional protection for countervailing speech, and should be treated differently than democracies. Local and international leaders should condemn the use of hate speech and make it culturally unacceptable. Leaders who incite genocide should be banned from international travel and have their foreign finances frozen. Hate radio stations should be shut down, and hate propaganda banned. Hate crimes and atrocities should be promptly punished.

4. ORGANIZATION: Genocide is always organized, usually by the state, often using militias to provide deniability of state responsibility (the Janjaweed in Darfur.) Sometimes organization is informal (Hindu mobs led by local RSS militants) or decentralized (terrorist groups.) Special army units or militias are often trained and armed. Plans are made for genocidal killings. To combat this stage, membership in these militias should be outlawed. Their leaders should be denied visas for foreign travel. The U.N. should impose arms embargoes on governments and citizens of countries involved in genocidal massacres, and create commissions to investigate violations, as was done in post-genocide Rwanda.

5. POLARIZATION: Extremists drive the groups apart. Hate groups broadcast polarizing propaganda. Laws may forbid intermarriage or social interaction. Extremist terrorism targets moderates, intimidating and silencing the center. Moderates from the perpetrators’ own group are most able to stop genocide, so are the first to be arrested and killed. Prevention may mean security protection for moderate leaders or assistance to human rights groups. Assets of extremists may be seized, and visas for international travel denied to them. Coups d’état by extremists should be opposed by international sanctions.

6. PREPARATION: Victims are identified and separated out because of their ethnic or religious identity. Death lists are drawn up. Members of victim groups are forced to wear identifying symbols. Their property is expropriated. They are often segregated into ghettoes, deported into concentration camps, or confined to a famine-struck region and starved. At this stage, a Genocide Emergency must be declared. If the political will of the great powers, regional alliances, or the U.N. Security Council can be mobilized, armed international intervention should be prepared, or heavy assistance provided to the victim group to prepare for its self-defense. Otherwise, at least humanitarian assistance should be organized by the U.N. and private relief groups for the inevitable tide of refugees to come.

7. EXTERMINATION begins, and quickly becomes the mass killing legally called “genocide.” It is “extermination” to the killers because they do not believe their victims to be fully human. When it is sponsored by the state, the armed forces often work with militias to do the killing. Sometimes the genocide results in revenge killings by groups against each other, creating the downward whirlpool-like cycle of bilateral genocide (as in Burundi). At this stage, only rapid and overwhelming armed intervention can stop genocide. Real safe areas or refugee escape corridors should be established with heavily armed international protection. (An unsafe “safe” area is worse than none at all.) The U.N. Standing High Readiness Brigade, EU Rapid Response Force, or regional forces -- should be authorized to act by the U.N. Security Council if the genocide is small. For larger interventions, a multilateral force authorized by the U.N. should intervene. If the U.N. is paralyzed, regional alliances must act. It is time to recognize that the international responsibility to protect transcends the narrow interests of individual nation states. If strong nations will not provide troops to intervene directly, they should provide the airlift, equipment, and financial means necessary for regional states to intervene.

8. DENIAL is the eighth stage that always follows a genocide. It is among the surest indicators of further genocidal massacres. The perpetrators of genocide dig up the mass graves, burn the bodies, try to cover up the evidence and intimidate the witnesses. They deny that they committed any crimes, and often blame what happened on the victims. They block investigations of the crimes, and continue to govern until driven from power by force, when they flee into exile. There they remain with impunity, like Pol Pot or Idi Amin, unless they are captured and a tribunal is established to try them. The response to denial is punishment by an international tribunal or national courts. There the evidence can be heard, and the perpetrators punished. Tribunals like the Yugoslav or Rwanda Tribunals, or an international tribunal to try the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, or an International Criminal Court may not deter the worst genocidal killers. But with the political will to arrest and prosecute them, some may be brought to justice.

© 1998 Gregory H. Stanton. Originally presented as a briefing paper at the US State Department in 1996.

Terrified white S.Africans plead for safe refuge with Dutch MP

“The Dutch government ‘has a very special responsibility towards all South Africans of Dutch descent’ – said Kees van der Staaij, chairman of the Staatkundig-Gereformeerde Party (SGP) - in response to a petition to Dutch MP Geert Wilders from terrified Afrikaans residents, pleading for a safe haven in the ‘country of their roots’…


AfrikanersNederlandAD2342010 2 April 23 2010 – A 450-strong group of white South Africans with Dutch roots this week lodged a formal petition with Dutch MP Geert Wilders – asking urgently for his help to flee the country because of the growing violence targetting white families. This has soared since the gruesome murder of the leader of the Afrikaner Weerstandsbeweging Eugene Terre’Blanche on April 3.

Conservative-Protestant party responds favourably to Afrikaner ‘bloodline’ immigration:

However while Mr Wilders has not yet responded to the petition from Mrs Lara Johnstone and her Facebook group, another Dutch MP, Mr. Kees van der Staaij of the Staatkundig-Gereformeerde Party (SGP) has responded most positively to the group’s request to be allowed to return to the country of their early forebears. MP Kees van der Staaij contact link: http://www.sgp.nl/Page/sp653/ml1/Index.html

In the article in the Dutch daily Algemeen Dagblad (click on pic to enlarge it), Dutch journalists Caspar Naber and Axel Veldhuijzen reported the contents of the petition and also quote the initiator,  Mrs Lara Johnstone, 43,  of George in the Western Cape, as saying that her forebears, surnamed Bosman, were sent to the then- Cape of Good Hope in 1707. “And although she, her two brothers, 37 and 41, and her parents, now in their seventies, were born and bred in South Africa, they all want to return to their European root-country: the Netherlands. And as quickly as possible – because they are terrified, reports AD in its page 3 report, writing:

"The family Johnstone wants to leave South Africa because of their fear of the increased violence targetting whites. And Lara Johnstone is not the only one."  Lara launched a petition with Dutch MP Geert Wilders on Tuesday. And while Mr Wilders – who just launched his election-manifesto for the forthcoming June parliamentary election -- had not yet had time to comment, the mooted chairman of the SGP party, Kees van der Staaij, did react very positively."The violence against whites in South Africa in a large problem,' he said.

“If they are targetted by violence, they should also be accepted as asylum-seekers in the Netherlands…”

Staaij Kees van der SGP agrees SA with Dutch roots should be allowed to return and also get asylum Mr van der Staaij’s conservative-protestant party moreover reportedly also believes that The Netherlands has 'a very special responsibility towards the often very religious South Africans of Dutch descent. "

Van der Staaij was quoted in AD as saying “If those people do not feel safe in their own country and want to settle here in The Netherlands, our country should consider those requests with a positive approach. Especially those South Africans who themselves have been victims of violence and who have family members who were targetted by violence, should be able to ask for and receive help from the Dutch government”, he said.

"And if these people are genuinely being threatened (with their lives), as far as I am concerned they would also be positively considered as as asylum-seekers,” he said.

The article also quoted Len van Eeden, 40, from Durban, whose forebears left the Netherlands for "the Cape" around 1800. The murder on Eugene Terre'Blanche also had him reconsider things, reports AD.

"We are getting very worried,' he said. His family also is investigating all its options for fleeing the country. "We are stuck in South Africa. Many other South Africans are doing the same thing. We aren't extreme-right wing Afrikaners like the AWB but moderate whites.' He visited Europe several times on vacation and as do many South Africans of Dutch roots, he said – and he too  wants to try and obtain Dutch nationality.' Mr Wilders has not yet responded to the petition from Lara Johnstone's group.


MP Kees van der Staaij contact link: http://www.sgp.nl/Page/sp653/ml1/Index.html

newspaper link to story: http://www.ad.nl/ad/nl/1000/Nieuws/article/detail/478692/2010/04/23/Bange-Zuid-Afrikanen-smeken-om-Wilders-hulp.dhtml

“Right of Return to Europe (‘jus-sanginis’ – bloodline) for Boer-Afrikaner refugees:” Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1026941238&ref=profile#!/group.php?gid=315909188446&ref=mf

latest violence targetting white South Africans April 22 2010 report: http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.com/2010/04/live-rocket-launcher-disarmed-in.html

for regular messages and updates also join Censorbugbear on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1026941238&ref=profile#!/pages/Censorbugbear-Reports/116752351671946?ref=ts

Adriana Stuijt personal facebook page:http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1026941238&ref=profile

Stop Boer genocide protest Stockholm Sweden – video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dA-mjy-KBXA


Some of the letters sent to Mr Van der Staaij in response to his comment above;


Geagte Meneer Van Der Staaij,

Ek wil eerstens begin om u te dank vir die tyd wat u neem om die brief te lees. Onlangs het daar n groep Suid Afrikaners u genader vir politiese toevlug. Ek wil my stem graag met hulle deel. Ons volk, die Afrikaners of te wel Boere, is op die drumpel van n volksmoord. Daagliks sterf daar meer as 50 mense, talle van hulle is van ons volk. Elke aand as ek my dogtertjie in haar bed neerle, bid ek dat die Vader ons die nag sal spaar. Elke oggend as ek wakker word, dank ek die Vader dat ons gespaar is. Om te dink hulle sal my 2 jarige dogter se skedel verbrysel teen die muur, my swanger vrou verkrag voor my oËn ons altwee dan martel en brutaal vermoor. Die gedagtes moet ons almal daagliks mee saam lewe. En daar is niks en niemand wat bereid is om ons by te staan in die tyd van nood nie.Baie van ons volk het al gevlug na Europa toe, maar daar is die, soos ek, wat nie die middele het om veiligheid so te bekom nie. Ons enigste uitweg is Politiese Toevlug.Ek hoop die brief vind u in goeie verstand en gesondheid.Beste Groete Les Rudman